3 ms·
1. You didn't provide any actual evidence or deeper claims than (putting something in parenthesis). I don't really believe the coal mine claim, as in reality we
by squeaky-clean 6y ago
1. You didn't provide any actual evidence or deeper claims than (putting something in parenthesis). I don't really believe the coal mine claim, as in reality we don't see that happening. Mining towns are still among the cheapest and poorest towns in America.
2. That's a really naive sense of economic productivity. Here is a thought experiment.
A) Let's shut down all of Amazon HQ1.
B) Let's shut down the dams that provide 86% of Seattle greater area's electricity.
Which one of these entities is ACTUALLY responsible for that "productivity" then? And I bet you rents in Seattle without electricity would drop far greater proportionally than they do out by the dams. Rent follows incomes, not productivity.
- ethanbond 6y agoThere is no deeper claim being made. We are saying the same thing. You can call it income if you'd like. A person's wages are some portion of their productivity. The distinction is irrelevant for this point.