1. It's hard to see how guaranteed income would put the less well off more at the mercy of the well off. And you don't provide a causal explanation of how this

1. It's hard to see how guaranteed income would put the less well off more at the mercy of the well off. And you don't provide a causal explanation of how this effect would arise. 2. Surely UBI is cash, not vouchers. At which point the particular lower-than-face-value scenario is moot. 3. This is a valid point. I'm not sure whether it's good or bad, but it does seem likely to entail some morality shake-up.