2 ms·
Slight aside: Poor people aren't trying to maximize profits. They are trying to minimize risk. It's a small quibble, but it helps explain the different behavio
by Balgair 6y ago
Slight aside: Poor people aren't trying to maximize profits. They are trying to minimize risk.
It's a small quibble, but it helps explain the different behavior of the wealthy and the poor. More importantly, it explains the mindset that changes with wealth.
Bret Devereaux of the acoup blog had a good piece on this in reference to medieval farming estates of lesser nobles and the abject poor [0]:
"I led in with all of that risk and vulnerability because without it just about nothing these farmers do makes a lot of sense; once you understand that they are managing risk, everything falls into place.
Most modern folks think in terms of profit maximization; we take for granted that we will still be alive tomorrow and instead ask how we can maximize how much money we have then (this is, admittedly, a lot less true for the least fortunate among us). We thus tend to favor efficient systems, even if they are vulnerable. From this perspective, ancient farmers – as we’ll see – look very silly, but this is a trap, albeit one that even some very august ancient scholars have fallen into. These are not irrational, unthinking people; they are poor, not stupid – those are not the same things.
But because these households wobble on the edge of disaster continually, that changes the calculus. These small subsistence farmers generally seek to minimize risk, rather than maximize profits. After all, improving yields by 5% doesn’t mean much if everyone starves to death in the third year because of a tail-risk that wasn’t mitigated. Moreover, for most of these farmers, working harder and farming more generally doesn’t offer a route out of the small farming class – these societies typically lack that kind of mobility (and also generally lack the massive wealth-creation potential of industrial power which powers that kind of mobility). Consequently, there is little gain to taking risks and much to lose. So as we’ll see, these farmers generally sacrifice efficiency for greater margins of safety, every time."
[0] https://acoup.blog/2020/07/24/collections-bread-how-did-they-make-it-part-i-farmers/ https://acoup.blog/2020/07/24/collections-bread-how-did-they...
- thereticent 6y agoWorth noting that much of the markup on smaller quantity retail items and interest for the poor (or even middle class) works because of this mitigation if risk before profit-loss.
- fallingfrog 6y agoAll this makes sense. I’d also point out though that there’s a societal aspect of this too- rich people have a lot of ways that they use to make sure that when things go badly, it’s poor people who pay the cost. So they have good reasons to worry less about tail risks. For instance: does your local city council respond to rising rents with the same urgency as they respond to falling real estate values? What did America put more money into during the coronavirus crisis, keeping people from being evicted or propping up the stock market? Rich people don’t worry about tail risks because they don’t have to.