5 ms·
Yeah exactly people do the same thing. There's good evidence that for the most part, our actions are driven by our "non-sentient" mind, and our sentient brain j
by IggleSniggle 6y ago
Yeah exactly people do the same thing. There's good evidence that for the most part, our actions are driven by our "non-sentient" mind, and our sentient brain just decides justifications to explain a cohesive story as it goes along after it happens.
"Why did you do that?" -> attempt to make up an answer that will be believable both to self-identity and to the listener.
So what's the point of the executive mind if the hindbrain is doing all the walking and talking?
The primary benefit of this story-making is that it allows formulating predictions and discarding the least probable. When a believable prediction kicks in, the predictive brain incentivizes the hindbrain with a partial taste of any reward or pain, with promises of more should the path transpire.
Disclaimer: not a neuroscientist, just a lifelong enthusiast of the subject.
- ZephyrBlu 6y agoThis is very believable. Post-rationalization just makes sense. Even if you come up with a shitty reason, at least you have _a_ reason for doing something.
- inakarmacoma 6y agoYour comment is an example of itself.
- red75prime 6y agoSituations, where you don't make cohesive story, but stop and think "What the hell I'm doing?", aren't uncommon either.