> I don't think it's an accident at all that science uses its own thick jargon instead of a simple approachable vocabulary. At least in my field of research, s

> I don't think it's an accident at all that science uses its own thick jargon instead of a simple approachable vocabulary. At least in my field of research, such views are held by few, if any. This is, IMO, an extremely bad faith argument. I think many in the field would love if the right information got out - even if incomplete, or with many unknowns. At least that would spare us by the media getting things totally wrong and pushing disinformation on people (and that's a bipartisan problem).