4 ms·
They've described part of TypeScript's approach. .rbs files: have types .rb files: no types .d.ts files: have types .ts files: have types It's a pretty sig
by untog 6y ago
They've described part of TypeScript's approach.
.rbs files: have types
.rb files: no types
.d.ts files: have types
.ts files: have types
It's a pretty significant difference. So they didn't "follow typescript's approach" here.
- floatboth 6y agoWell, .rb types won't have the standard type signatures (that could be consumed by various typecheckers) but could still have a particular typechecker's custom annotations…