>England doesn’t have a constitution. Yes it does. It doesn't have a written constitution. (Or at least, the main elements of the constitution are not codified

>England doesn’t have a constitution. Yes it does. It doesn't have a written constitution. (Or at least, the main elements of the constitution are not codified in a single privileged written document. There are documents such as magna carta that form an important part of legal tradition that feeds into British constitutional law.). The constitution of the UK defines quite clearly the role of the monarch, which is not anywhere near as wide-ranging as you imagine. If you don't even know this basic fact about the UK, you really have no business commenting on the UK vs the US. With regard to Northern Ireland, Meghan, etc., you are framing your comments in a way that makes a sensible discussion impossible, so I won't take the bait.