3 ms·
Ianal but it might go under tortious interference?
by im3w1l 6y ago
Ianal but it might go under tortious interference?
- vageli 6y agoI was thinking more along the lines of criminal laws, I should have been more specific in my word choice.
- barbecue_sauce 6y agoThe word "lawsuit", at least in American english, has the connotation of a civil rather than a criminal case.
- klank 6y agoNo, I don't believe it would apply. Tortious interference is when you interfere with the contractual relationship itself. In this case the continued obligations is what would drive the economic harm, thus tortious interference wouldn't apply.