> Your claim "But although the grain effect is available for digital photos, it is seldom seen." is a fallacy. Yet it's factually true. > I was rebutting the

> Your claim "But although the grain effect is available for digital photos, it is seldom seen." is a fallacy. Yet it's factually true. > I was rebutting the claim that shooting film on celluloid would 'go away' Perhaps I did not choose the best words. It will not disappear from the face of the Earth, of course. But it will be relegated to "retro" or nostalgic movies, etc. It depends on how quickly the new, less limited technologies are adopted by the big names in cinema, and of course by how quickly the old generation, accustomed to the old way a film "is supposed to look", will retrain their taste or die off. :)