5 ms·
Seems fair to me. Apple provided with you a service and charged your for it. It is a cost associated with distributing / developing your product. Why should App
by oliverx0 6y ago
Seems fair to me. Apple provided with you a service and charged your for it. It is a cost associated with distributing / developing your product. Why should Apple be responsible for refunding you? It was not their fault that the customer decided their money back.
- weaksauce 6y agoNo it’s not fair. This can be a tool that competitors use to hurt you financially. If the customer gets a refund the slate should be wiped clean. That’s fair.
- oliverx0 6y agoIt’s easy to think it’s fair because the cost to Apple is low. But in principle, let’s assume that it costs Apple a significant amount of money and effort to make the transaction happen, for which they charge you that 30%. Seems unfair then that Apple has to be held responsible for refunding a service they provided when it was not their fault the customer wanted the money back for your product.
- sukilot 6y agoObviously, assuming wildly false claims can lead to unreasonable conclusions.
- saagarjha 6y agoApple prices the exact same things into hardware distribution too, but when you ask for your money back there they give it back in full, not minus the “service” they already provided you.
- oliverx0 6y agoAnd I think that’s great! I just don’t think they need to be forced to do it. If I were Apple I would definitely refund. But I don’t agree that it should be an obligation for them to do it.
- glofish 6y agoHow do you know that? The interface and what you can do/demonstrate in the store is severely limited.
- alickz 6y ago> It is a cost associated with distributing / developing your product. On top of the non-negotiable $99/y developer account fee.