4 ms·
> You need a better source. There was supervision in that case You're being disingenuous again. Read the article. She was given the drugs by her parents, who w
by notacoward 6y ago
> You need a better source. There was supervision in that case
You're being disingenuous again. Read the article. She was given the drugs by her parents, who were not authorized to prescribe them or supervise their use on their own. The outcome is not the point. The point is the lack of proper supervision. The outcome could have been different, and it would still be wrong for people to be using HCQ other than in a controlled trial ... but that's exactly what hype like yours leads to.
- ColanR 6y agoYou're deriving way too much from an uninformative article. "Given the drugs by her parents" doesn't mean they were prescribed by her parents. Did the article say whether there was no doctor involved? Also. The girl had an autoimmune disorder, for which the same drugs are commonly used. Did the article happen to say whether or not she was already on the drugs? The article also says nothing about whether the drugs had anything to do with her demise. It sure does imply that, though. This is a cherry picked article.
- mannanj 6y agoLove when people who get all their news from mainstream media news articles become experts at