I mean any anarchist that means it in the leftist sense will always fall into the same trap: that they're attempting to describe a system with very specific soc

I mean any anarchist that means it in the leftist sense will always fall into the same trap: that they're attempting to describe a system with very specific social and economic outcomes, while either failing to describe the apparatus necessary to achieve those outcomes, or invariably describing an authoritarian state while calling it anything but. "It's not a state. It's a collectivist system of syndicate guilds that democratically allocate..." let me go ahead and cut you off there. That's a state, and an extremely authoritarian one at that.