Two things: 1. Take PG like an opinion piece in the newspaper. 2. This article so vehemently tries to criticize PG for his lack of sources, but it itself does

Two things: 1. Take PG like an opinion piece in the newspaper. 2. This article so vehemently tries to criticize PG for his lack of sources, but it itself does not provide sources or data to support their criticism; instead it raises more rhetorical questions. Before you go out to publicly criticize someone, make sure you’ve got your own ground covered. Otherwise, it is just a metaphorical stone fight between the two. I’m looking for a chess game, not a stone pelting contest. Perhaps with both parties dressed, suited and politely dismantling each other’s tactics with reason, logic and data. It could be a draw or it could lead to a checkmate. Both acceptable and the game concludes with a handshake. Also some low blows to SV folks - CEOs and “intellectuals”. That was really glib and poorly organized, written and put forth.