6 ms·

Many engineering programs require an ethics class already, and many STEM degrees require TWO YEARS of "liberal arts rounding" classes. I learned nothing in thos

Many engineering programs require an ethics class already, and many STEM degrees require TWO YEARS of "liberal arts rounding" classes. I learned nothing in those classes that I couldn't teach myself, but I sure as hell paid a lot of money for them. Additionally, every single university student has had 13 YEARS worth of liberal arts education before they've taken their first university-level class. If 13 years wasn't enough to "round out" a student, then what good will another few years do?

freeone3000 6y ago
The "13 years" of compulsory education are foundational, but cannot adequately address topics in any depth, at all. A student who has taken "13 years" of math might be able to solve for x and y in a system of equations and calculate compound interest. Two additional years would grant them an understanding of set theory, Bayesian statistics, or calculus. Nearly no ethics or civics is taught during the compulsory period. No philosophy, very little critical reasoning. What we could do with just a little bit there.
pansa2 6y ago
> many STEM degrees require TWO YEARS of "liberal arts rounding" classes. Is that true in Australia? I assumed universities in Australia would be similar to the UK, where all classes are in the chosen subject only?
- Khaine 6y ago
  That is correct, stem degrees in Australia do not include liberal arts rounding.
  - logicchains 6y ago
    It depends on the university; at University of Melbourne they do.
    - adamjb 6y ago
      As someone who has gone through the Melbourne Model, I don't know if I'd call the semester's worth of breadths in the BSc "liberal arts rounding" in the same sense as people are using it here, mainly because it's a free choice of subjects outside your degree (and most subjects are available). E.g. it's not uncommon to take management subjects as an "employable" breadth.
- hnick 6y ago
  It varies by Uni. When I studied there was no enforced "rounding", but you only needed a certain number of units of a type to hit a target degree but a higher total number of units was required to graduate. It was then up to the student what they studied in the spare units (science, language, accounting, Chinese calligraphy, etc) with an option to cram more in or add an extra year for a double-degree. Sometimes units in different departments were very highly encouraged, such as formal logic in philosophy when doing CS or EE.
- NamTaf 6y ago
  In my experience as an engineer in Australia, I did 0 liberal arts rounding. At the time, I didn't see the point. I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it and been quite annoyed by it, especially if it wasn't given through an engineering-specific lens. However, these days I've come to realise the value it can provide. I did not even have an engineering ethics class.
- MaximumYComb 6y ago
  My comp sci degree had 0 rounding classes. Every class was comp sci or math.

freeone3000 6y ago

The "13 years" of compulsory education are foundational, but cannot adequately address topics in any depth, at all. A student who has taken "13 years" of math might be able to solve for x and y in a system of equations and calculate compound interest. Two additional years would grant them an understanding of set theory, Bayesian statistics, or calculus. Nearly no ethics or civics is taught during the compulsory period. No philosophy, very little critical reasoning. What we could do with just a little bit there.

pansa2 6y ago

> many STEM degrees require TWO YEARS of "liberal arts rounding" classes. Is that true in Australia? I assumed universities in Australia would be similar to the UK, where all classes are in the chosen subject only?

Khaine 6y ago
That is correct, stem degrees in Australia do not include liberal arts rounding.
- logicchains 6y ago
  It depends on the university; at University of Melbourne they do.
  - adamjb 6y ago
    As someone who has gone through the Melbourne Model, I don't know if I'd call the semester's worth of breadths in the BSc "liberal arts rounding" in the same sense as people are using it here, mainly because it's a free choice of subjects outside your degree (and most subjects are available). E.g. it's not uncommon to take management subjects as an "employable" breadth.
hnick 6y ago
It varies by Uni. When I studied there was no enforced "rounding", but you only needed a certain number of units of a type to hit a target degree but a higher total number of units was required to graduate. It was then up to the student what they studied in the spare units (science, language, accounting, Chinese calligraphy, etc) with an option to cram more in or add an extra year for a double-degree. Sometimes units in different departments were very highly encouraged, such as formal logic in philosophy when doing CS or EE.
NamTaf 6y ago
In my experience as an engineer in Australia, I did 0 liberal arts rounding. At the time, I didn't see the point. I probably wouldn't have enjoyed it and been quite annoyed by it, especially if it wasn't given through an engineering-specific lens. However, these days I've come to realise the value it can provide. I did not even have an engineering ethics class.
MaximumYComb 6y ago
My comp sci degree had 0 rounding classes. Every class was comp sci or math.