28 ms·
This is certainly a sort of restating of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occams_razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occams_razor except with the assumption that the
by th0ma5 16y ago
This is certainly a sort of restating of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occams_razor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occams_razor except with the assumption that there's a lot of material to start with.
I think these kinds of patterns are nice thought experiments for sure... for instance the antithesis to what you speak is to start with the absolute bare minimum, and then to consternate quite a bit before adding anything.
Additionally one could use randomness or Vonnegut style cut-ups to juxtapose unrelated ideas into possibly new concepts.
I'm glad you have found a method that works for you! That is perhaps the best statement of all.
- pankratiev 16y ago> to start with the absolute bare minimum, and then to consternate quite a bit before adding anything It's also a good approach but it doesn't work for me. For example, I started from the small set of features. When I implemented them and started adding more features I understood that the previous design doesn't fit, so I should modify it. The main problem for me in this approach is that I haven't a complete picture of the project.