4 ms·
I appreciate your intent but tbh I found this confusing. I think perhaps we want to talk about two different things and have been trying to squeeze that into on
by adamsea 6y ago
I appreciate your intent but tbh I found this confusing. I think perhaps we want to talk about two different things and have been trying to squeeze that into one conversation.
- pandaman 6y agoAll I am saying that you are challenging me to discuss judgments over your opinions in assumption that your opinions are facts. While I might agree with the same judgments over actual facts I do not agree with the opinions, which the judgments are based on so there is no possibility of discussion here.
- adamsea 6y agoBut isn't it just your own opinion that that which I challenged you to discuss which you have definitively determined to be opinion on which the judgements we are attempting to logically calculate derive themselves from are in fact not actual fact but in fact merely opinions of me myself and therefore ineligible grounds for any determining judgements which might possibly instantiate any form of conversation in which we might converse? ;) By the way you might find this interesting ; ) https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/ https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwel... "The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink." LOL OK I should stop my linguistic dick-waving.