4 ms·
Conservapedia’s math articles have a pretty amusing history: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Conservapedian_mathematics https://rationalwiki.org/wi
by Steko 6y ago
Conservapedia’s math articles have a pretty amusing history:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Conservapedian_mathematics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Conservapedian_m...
- Steko 6y agoAlso on the topic of set theory: https://boingboing.net/2012/08/07/what-do-christian-fundamentali.html https://boingboing.net/2012/08/07/what-do-christian-fundamen...
- 082349872349872 6y agoWow. But come to think of it, set theory is subtle stuff compared with 1+1+1 = 1 (unless they're talking about characteristic 2?) or reading the old testament under a non-injective mapping (in particular, the Book of Ruth, a non-identity element, seems to be in their kernel?). Q. what's an anagram of Banach-Tarski?