4 ms·
I wonder how it compares to AES-NI. Technically that's not a hash, but it can be abused to be, and due to the hardware support the bandwidth is pretty good.
by Const-me 6y ago
I wonder how it compares to AES-NI. Technically that's not a hash, but it can be abused to be, and due to the hardware support the bandwidth is pretty good.
- jnwatson 6y agoIn the second table, you can see the performance of MeowHash which uses AES-NI. It is comparable in performance to XXH3 with AVX2.
- The_rationalist 6y agoMeowHash (in the benchmarck table) is actually the second fastest hash for large data and use hardware accalerated AES. Still xxHash3 win everywhere, for any kind of data (it seems) and is portable.
- telendram 6y agoAES-NI can be used as a hash, but don't assume that it makes a good job at it. Latest version of MeowHash is fine, but all other variants and prior versions have shitty collision ratios, equivalent to a ~50 bits hash : https://github.com/Cyan4973/xxHash/wiki/Collision-ratio-comparison#testing-64-bit-non-portable-hashes- https://github.com/Cyan4973/xxHash/wiki/Collision-ratio-comp...
- eggsome 6y agoIs there a 2 axis graph that has both collision ratios and speed?