3 ms·
I would use vanilla JS rather than jQuery now that most browser compatibility issues are sorted. But most of my work doesn't need to support versions of IE olde
by wilsonrocks 6y ago
I would use vanilla JS rather than jQuery now that most browser compatibility issues are sorted. But most of my work doesn't need to support versions of IE older than 11.
- cblconfederate 6y agowhich is exactly what they are doing (also , nominally vanilla JS is even more legacy than JQ)
- holoduke 6y agoisn't jQuery nowadays also using all native functions of a browser? I still find the regex selector so powerful in jQuery.
- wolco 6y agoWhat do you gain? What do you lose? jQuery has a better syntax and smaller coding footprint.