I think by definition, if one person collects the majority of the profit from the effort of 100, it is undeserved. If those 100 people can’t afford things like

I think by definition, if one person collects the majority of the profit from the effort of 100, it is undeserved. If those 100 people can’t afford things like health care and housing, they have been crushed. I’m not arguing socialism v. capitalism. I’m simply pointing out that a trend of widening inequality leads to deep systemic problems, and is not sustainable. We can correct it without gasp socialism. Laws, regulation, and political finance reform are likely sufficient.