4 ms·
nevermind!
by dencodev 6y ago
nevermind!
- Schiendelman 6y agoAs a landlord, this is not true in several ways. First, in every municipality I've leased in, a landlord is only entitled to the rent from a broken lease up to the point where they find a new tenant. Second, landlords can't typically collect rent after a date of eviction (same reasoning - you can't charge for a service you haven't rendered). Third, rents are dropping across the US. It's not a given that they'll find another tenant immediately. Fourth, the cost to recover rent is high, and usually not worth it.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dencodev 6y agoYou're right - I forgot that finding a new tenant stops the obligation for the previous tenant.
- harambae 6y ago>rents are dropping across the US do you have a citation for this? my experience in Boston in that landlords have stopped jacking up rents. that's about it. I haven't seen any come down yet.