3 ms·
He earns 10-20% less but they work significantly more than 10-20% more. If they worked (and had worked) the same hours per year, they'd make significantly less
by luckylion 6y ago
He earns 10-20% less but they work significantly more than 10-20% more. If they worked (and had worked) the same hours per year, they'd make significantly less money than he does.
That's expected, the state pays it's employees very well for a multitude of reasons, but primarily: to buy their loyalty, to make them less susceptible to bribes, and to encourage stability. It also has no reason not to, there's no competition.
I don't know the Danish situation, but e.g. a teacher in Germany will have a pension that is higher than the salary of 70-80% of the population.
- JanSt 6y agoTeachers in Germany also have 19.5 (now 18.5) years of education. There are few jobs that require more (e.g. doctors).
- ckuehne 6y agoSo, how much percent in pension payments for teachers would the German taxpayer save if the state required, say, one year less teacher education?
- JanSt 6y agoThe question does not make sense to me. It‘s a market. You require a masters degree and an additional tough 1.5 years of training? Better pay me well, through salary or benefits. Let‘s not kid ourselves: most of us (highly qualified) white collars in the private sector enjoy some additional retirement scheme and can reach much higher salaries.
- tremon 6y agoWhy shouldn't a teacher have a high pension? I can't think of a job that's more important to the long-term viability of a country than that of a teacher.
- luckylion 6y agoA high pension is one thing. A pension that's higher than the salary of most of the population is quite another. I'm not arguing that teacher shouldn't be paid well, I'm saying that the state is paying it's officials very well. Not because of the jobs they do, but because of who employs them. Teachers in Germany that are not employed by the state get significantly less.