5 ms·
>Chomsky’s take on the substance of what Greenspan said seems reasonably on target. Read the entire thing. It's not quite "pants on fire", its just not an exac
by entropea 6y ago
>Chomsky’s take on the substance of what Greenspan said seems reasonably on target.
Read the entire thing. It's not quite "pants on fire", its just not an exact quote. OP posting "explicitly" is incorrect since it's from Chomsky, however.
- shuckles 6y agoChomsky and the original poster imparted a connotation which is simply not present in the original text.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]