4 ms·
I understand the counterargument to using NZ. I'm saying you can't have it both ways. That is just a side effect, anyway. My main counter claim to the top-leve
by ibejoeb 6y ago
I understand the counterargument to using NZ. I'm saying you can't have it both ways. That is just a side effect, anyway.
My main counter claim to the top-level comment is that the messaging is not uniform.
As an example, I've pointed out that policy differs between neighboring areas, and, indeed, policy differs from science.
There is an entire section of the attached material under the heading "Risks and pitfalls." I didn't write it, so forgive me if I'm not too upset that people don't like it.
- darkerside 6y agoI think the message is uniform at this point that, if you are in a COVID hot zone, you should be wearing a mask. Claiming that is not the case and providing irrelevant examples can rightly be met with anger because it undermines the uniformity of that message. EDIT: For the record, I'm not angry :)