I don't follow. Why draw a distinction between the "mode" of speech, and its "content", and what exactly is the difference? With apologies, it sounds like a "n

I don't follow. Why draw a distinction between the "mode" of speech, and its "content", and what exactly is the difference? With apologies, it sounds like a "no true Scotsman" position, where censorship is only real when it bolsters one side of the argument.