3 ms·
This is too simplistic. Samsung and Globalfoundires have fabs in the US that are close to leading edge. There are other fabs that are leading edge for other ty
by bgorman 6y ago
This is too simplistic.
Samsung and Globalfoundires have fabs in the US that are close to leading edge. There are other fabs that are leading edge for other types of chips e.g. Texas Instruments
The fact is that the capital expenditure costs to create a leading edge Fab are insane, and economies of scale form a big moat. The economics do not really support more than a few leading edge fabs, and now that Intel has had internal issues they are behind. Maybe they will catch up- however throwing money at the problem does not seem likely to me to fix the problem. Moore's law is ending and the difference between die shrinks isn't as dramatic as it used to be. It remains to be seen if electron tunnelling can be easily be dealt with... However fabs are sexy and people will chase the money until the process breaks down.
- objektif 6y agoSo we should just give up then and hand the IP to China? I do not understand this way of thinking Intel became Intel because of innovations they did.
- egsmi 6y agoTechnically we’re selling it to China, not giving it. Notice: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_equipment_sales_leaders_by_year https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_equipment_sale...