4 ms·
I guess FPGA tech moves pretty slowly.
by ColanR 6y ago
I guess FPGA tech moves pretty slowly.
- boxfire 6y agoI am guessing this work didn't end, its just in the dark world. I would really love to work with a 2-3 ghz dynamically reconfigurable FPGA. I wonder if we will see them in a public setting any time soon. It seems the foundation is there.
- jhallenworld 6y agoPeople keep trying: http://www.pldworld.com/html/technote/FPGA-startups-stare-down-giants-and-ghosts/4083730_files/1565chart_pg18.gif http://www.pldworld.com/html/technote/FPGA-startups-stare-do...
- FullyFunctional 6y agoOh Tabula, how I rooted for thee. Note, the graph is misleading as C-switch pivoted away from FPGAs way before Tabula died. It is remarkable how difficult it is to establish a new FPGA company. I'd say Achronix seems to be doing well, but even they had to pivot from their origin (async FPGAs)
- jhallenworld 6y agoDidn't Achronix have some relationship with Intel? I thought they bought them, but I guess not.. Actel->Microsemi->Microchip is still going. Their PolarFire FPGAs are competitive with Lattice for sure, seem to have better MIPI support than Crosslink.
- oldgradstudent 6y ago> Didn't Achronix have some relationship with Intel? I thought they bought them, but I guess not.. They had some manufacturing agreement with Intel, but I have no idea if anything came out of it. Edit: https://www.eetimes.com/intel-to-fab-fpgas-for-startup-achronix/ https://www.eetimes.com/intel-to-fab-fpgas-for-startup-achro...