The only evidence for federal officers being injured in Portland comes from a high level DHS press conference. If this were a violent confrontation, wouldn't s

The only evidence for federal officers being injured in Portland comes from a high level DHS press conference. If this were a violent confrontation, wouldn't some of the literally thousands of cameras turned on it be turning up something... violent? I don't doubt that a few cops have turned ankles or suffered equipment mishaps in an environtment like this, but I'll want to see actual evidence and not a talking head before I believe that a "violent rioter" did it with a weapon or whatever. I mean, if you just want to count physical injuries, there's a kid still in the hospital who took an impact munition to the face. I'll say it again: there are effectively no "violent rioters" in Portland. There are a bunch of people like you citing other stuff as indirect evidence that the violent rioters must be there. There are no shots of riots. You don't find that strange?