2 ms·
>nor did I say that Ethereum / IPFS provide any value. Not true: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15367531 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15367531
by nix23 6y ago
>nor did I say that Ethereum / IPFS provide any value.
Not true:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15367531 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15367531
Bitcoin:
https://www.coindesk.com/blackballed-by-paypal-scientific-paper-pirate-takes-bitcoin-donations https://www.coindesk.com/blackballed-by-paypal-scientific-pa...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2019/04/26/how-bitcoin-and-wikileaks-saved-each-other/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2019/04/26/how-bitco...
- carterklein13 6y agoOkay, jeez, I can't win here. The second you start to advocate for blockchain or mention its potential utility, people will glom on and mock you for being a pipe dreaming gambler. The second you start to advocate against it or mention its overvaluation, people will glom on and mock you for your bootlicking close-mindedness. Personally, I believe in blockchain. I think Ethereum and IPFS may one day be hugely successful. I own ETH, BTC, and a few other coins that I do believe in but also would not be surprised / upset if they went to $0.00 tomorrow. Yes, I know that's gambling. BUT, MY POINT IN MY ORIGINAL COMMENT WAS THAT NOT TO DO WITH MY BELIEF IN BLOCKCHAIN. I was literally just trying to point out, from a journalistic standpoint, that it was odd they made no mention of anything to do with blockchain / DLT. Seriously, I feel like one of the most damaging things to the space as a whole is that it's almost impossible to find a level-headed conversation about it.
- nix23 6y ago>Seriously, I feel like one of the most damaging things to the space as a whole is that it's almost impossible to find a level-headed conversation about it. Just because you think that someone has to be for or against it, why not see it as plus and minus like every technology?