The perfect is the enemy of the good. -- Voltaire OK, if you're going to downvote this, please tell me how you plan to convince git and Github to replace PGP

The perfect is the enemy of the good. -- Voltaire OK, if you're going to downvote this, please tell me how you plan to convince git and Github to replace PGP with signify? Github in particular has invested significant time building up their PGP support. Personally, I would be fine with signify, I've used it in the past and I like it, and I think people are right when they say we should move toward more focused, Unix-style cryptographic tools - for greenfield projects. But that doesn't we should abandon all current uses of PGP, particularly when it's working as well as it is with git and Github. There's absolutely nothing wrong with it. It does what it's supposed to. It took a long time to get PGP supported by Github, and now you're going to want them to change it? Edit: If people want to add support to Git for signify, and lobby Github to support it, I'd be in favor. But strongly, strongly opposed to removing PGP support.