3 ms·
I don't think he's saying that being a CEO is harder than being a parent or teacher. His main point is that CEO's often underestimate the mental/emotional strai
by jasonshen 16y ago
I don't think he's saying that being a CEO is harder than being a parent or teacher. His main point is that CEO's often underestimate the mental/emotional strain that comes with their role. It's true that people who are fired have to live with the consequences - but they usually have friends and family to empathize and support them. Nobody is going to listen to a CEO's sob story about how hard it was to lay off someone - but the fact is it's quite painful.
When I was running the Stanford Daily, we were bleeding cash and I had to lay off a 65 year old lady who had been working at the company for 10 years. She was reliable but did poor work and was costing the company tens of thousands of dollars annually. That conversation was not fun and the entire process was stressful. I can't imagine having to lay off an entire division, especially of people that I hired.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- mkramlich 16y agoThis is part of the reason that I'd ideally like to never have employees. Because it would be horrible to have to lay someone off.
- shalmanese 16y agoThat's like saying you never want to have sex because you heard that Herpes was kind of itchy.
- mkramlich 16y agolol :) No it's like saying that given a choice between several alternatives or permutations, where each of which can cause me to have say a $1m/yr income, some of which require that I have employees and some of which do not, that I'd prefer the scenarios where I did not. It does not mean I'm 100% opposed to it under all circumstances, just that I consider it a non-ideal and problematic state, best avoided or minimized.