6 ms·
Actually, pensions are paid for by returns to investing funds, not the next generation-- at least that was the idea. The problem is that: 1. Governments don't
by jasonpbecker 6y ago
Actually, pensions are paid for by returns to investing funds, not the next generation-- at least that was the idea. The problem is that:
1. Governments don't put even the actuarially required amounts into pension funds that assume 7-9% rates of return on fund investments.
2. Governments have been slow to adjust their expectations on returns, since 7-9% is far less achievable than it was in the 80s and 90s when interest rates were much higher.
Permanent low interest rates, economic downturns, and underfunding pension funds together have created an untenable environment. The cash isn't there in many municipal and state pension funds, and earning that much in returns is laughably difficult or requires an inordinate amount of payments now.
Now, it's absolutely true that the USPS is being held to a ridiculous and overcorrected standard in this case. But it's not the case that our current pension obligations, in many of these local and state retirement funds, can be paid for through current employee cash receipts.