The article concludes with this: Against this background, we argue that preserving employability cannot and should not solely be the burden of the

The article concludes with this: Against this background, we argue that preserving employability cannot and should not solely be the burden of the developers themselves. Companies should take their share of responsibility, encourage practices that welcome developers of any age and curb those negatively affecting older developers. Ok I don't disagree. But how is such a conclusion justified by googling a "age software developer" and seeing what pops up? Paper seems pretty thin.