3 ms·
2-3 weeks is not even remotely persistent.
by anoncake 6y ago
2-3 weeks is not even remotely persistent.
- azinman2 6y agoThat is the CDC’s survey. There’s plenty of data out there suggesting many people are experiencing more potentially permanent effects / damage.
- anoncake 6y agoThat's a fine source if you want to prove that fully recovering from COVID often takes more than a few weeks. But that is not the question here. > There’s plenty of data out there suggesting many people are experiencing more potentially permanent effects / damage. Since you already know that data, would you please tell me where to find it?
- azinman2 6y agohttps://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-covid-related-symptoms-persist-recovery.html https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-covid-related-symptom... A Google search will yield many results. It’s not hard to find.
- anoncake 6y agoSo you can't. Got it.
- azinman2 6y agoI literally provided a link to you showing exactly that. Did you not read it? But I'll feed the troll, why not: https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/two-months-after-infection-covid-19-symptoms-persist/ https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/07/two-months-after-inf... https://www.prevention.com/health/a33432800/long-term-covid-19-symptoms/ https://www.prevention.com/health/a33432800/long-term-covid-... https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2020/07/24/open-letter-covid-19-long-hauler-me-cfs/ https://www.healthrising.org/blog/2020/07/24/open-letter-cov... https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2020/07/25/covid-19-long-haulers-fight-months-lingering-symptoms/5420534002/ https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/health/2020/07/25/cov... https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-it-means-to-be-a-coronavirus-long-hauler/ https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-it-means-to-be-a-cor... https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/06/09/long-haul-symptoms https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2020/06/09/long-haul... https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/07/21/covid-19-long-hauler-breathing https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/07/21/covid-19-long-hau... https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-tail-coronavirus-prolong-months.html https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-tail-coronavirus-prol... https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-19-long-haulers-report-nearly-100-symptoms-more-100-n1235217 https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-19-long-hau... https://www.today.com/health/covid-19-long-haulers-doctor-talks-having-symptoms-over-2-t185712 https://www.today.com/health/covid-19-long-haulers-doctor-ta... Satisfied now?
- anoncake 6y ago10 articles of anecdotes are just as worthless as 1.
- azinman2 6y agoThe Rome study linked was 143 people, not 10. It seems like you’re moving the goal posts. You said you can’t produce one, I originally did and followed up with many more. Then you say that’s worthless, which means you didn’t even read those links. You’re not discussing things in good faith, which is a violation of the norms here in HN. We saw the same pattern with far bigger studies with SARS. The fact of the matter is this is all very new, and conclusive data will take time. But there’s plenty of evidence already to suggest that for some it behaves like SARS and that’s very concerning. We also don’t know if this will behave like herpes or chickenpox and cause problems later in life even for those who “recovered.” There’s a reason why the world world is taking this seriously.
- anoncake 6y agoRight, I didn't read all those links. I checked one at random, saw it's anecdotal bullshit and decided not to sift through the rest in the hope there could be something valuable in there. But hey, spamming links is a step up from "Google yourself, there's plenty of evidence [I don't bother to cite].