That's why I said 'it must be evaluated in context and in combination with other truths'. I am confused about what the original poster and the first replyer ar

That's why I said 'it must be evaluated in context and in combination with other truths'. I am confused about what the original poster and the first replyer are trying to say. Are they putting some sort of value judgement on the existance of the information? Are they saying, "it does not matter how much evidence exists indicating that the Chinese may have discovered Spratly Islands long time ago, because the conclusion is still that China has no rights to the Spratly islands, and therefore all true facts about this subject should be dismissed out of hand"?