3 ms·
Just because its depricated doesn't mean it is unused. People still use Python 2.7.
by zitterbewegung 6y ago
Just because its depricated doesn't mean it is unused.
People still use Python 2.7.
- chrisseaton 6y agoIt's not deprecated - it was deprecated and now it's completely gone. Like Python 2.7, you can now only get support for JWS if you pay or if you go through a third-party. If you're still using it I recommend you get off fast.
- sdinsn 6y ago> now it's completely gone. ...From newer versions. Old JDK versions have been kept the same, and Java 7 & 8 are still in heavy use. > you can now only get support for JWS if you pay or if you go through a third-party. Not everyone needs enterprise support.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> Old JDK versions have been kept the same, and Java 7 & 8 are still in heavy use. But they aren't getting free security updates. > Not everyone needs enterprise support. Run it without security patches? That's suicidal for a system like JWS. Or do you think there's some option that is still support but not specifically enterprise and doesn't cost anything? I would take a look at who historically contributes security patches to OpenJDK and think about if you free vendor really has the expertise you think they do to keep up with security attacks.
- sdinsn 6y ago> Or do you think there's some option that is still support but not specifically enterprise and doesn't cost anything? Yes, Amazon backports security updates to Amazon Corretto (fork of OpenJDK 8 and 11)
- chrisseaton 6y ago> Amazon backports security updates to Amazon Corretto There's a flaw in your logic there... JWS is gone in new versions, so there aren't any security updates for it in the newer versions either. You can't backport a patch which hasn't been written.