3 ms·
I could see an argument for this if: 1. They limited themselves to blocking content that was decidedly harmful (phishing sites, malware, etc.), AND 2. They we
by paulgb 6y ago
I could see an argument for this if:
1. They limited themselves to blocking content that was decidedly harmful (phishing sites, malware, etc.), AND
2. They were transparent about what links they blocked and why.
It seems that neither was the case here.
- luckylion 6y agoThe limitation might be there, but bans are usually not surgical. If you have a thousand subdomains of some domain hosting spam, you'll likely block the domain if it's not a major player like wordpress.com. Transparency would be nice indeed. The argument I keep hearing against it is that they believe it would help the spammers.