4 ms·
Meh.. I find it difficult to care too much on a site whose population regularly fawn over a billionaire who stands to make billions more, largely due to booking
by james412 6y ago
Meh.. I find it difficult to care too much on a site whose population regularly fawn over a billionaire who stands to make billions more, largely due to booking sale of taxpayer-funded carbon credits to his company's most recent quarterly earnings as profit.
People around the world have different value systems and tolerances. For me it's impossible to consider state-funded excesses of the church without drawing comparisons to the likes of Musk. As for their relative social benefit, that's another topic entirely..
- jacquesm 6y agoThose have pretty clearly stated profit aims. Churches, not so much.
- james412 6y agoYour complaint was about use of public money: > they are currently building a church to the tune of 100 million euros. > 70% or more of that came from public funding, essentially tax payer money rerouted to build this monstrosity, something the country really can not afford. In Tesla's case, $428m of public money contributed almost one third of all profits made by the company in a single /quarter/, at a time when the dollar's future as a reserve currency is being called into question due to panic spending to support a system on the brink of collapse. The trick will likely qualify it for inclusion in the S&P 500, making it further eligible for more of that sweet public money over winter, as the current administration discusses that index's performance as an explicit target on an almost weekly basis.
- jacquesm 6y agoNo, my complaint is about churches and their lack of transparency with regards to how they process their income and the fact that they don't pay taxes. The should never receive taxpayer funds.
- forgotmypw17 6y agoThank you for commenting, I had no idea there was that much public money going into Tesla.