4 ms·
> No. Laravel performs quite nicely. Rails can't be compared to Laravel, it's slower by an order of magnitude, as mentioned previously No, that's outright wron
by tutfbhuf 6y ago
> No. Laravel performs quite nicely. Rails can't be compared to Laravel, it's slower by an order of magnitude, as mentioned previously
No, that's outright wrong. Please see the well respected techempower web benchmark: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/
> For the ones who will google what Swoole is, some benchmarks I've done on my laptop show 5x (yes, 5 times, 500%) increase in performance when Laravel is ran via Swoole.
Yup, that seems to be correct. What are the drawbacks of Swoole?
- fraktl 6y ago> No, that's outright wrong. Please see the well respected techempower web benchmark: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ I just notified the servers I've to manage (and my coworkers) that we're outright wrong and the load we're seeing is phantasm and that guy from internet told us so since he linked the well respected techempower benchmarks, which apparently reflect real world situation :)
- tutfbhuf 6y agoIf you and your co-workers have both Rails and Laravel in production and your Laravel applications performs better, then I have absolutely no doubt about that. However, there is no evidence that Rails is an order of magnitude slower than Laravel in general, quite the contrary, benchmarks indicating that (non-swoole) Laravel is slower.