2 ms·

I dont know. From what I can understand of German/Google translate, the third from top: https://www.enforcementtracker.com/ https://www.enforcementtracker.com

by jaclaz 6y ago

I dont know. From what I can understand of German/Google translate, the third from top: https://www.enforcementtracker.com/ https://www.enforcementtracker.com/ Link to .pdf: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Dsk/DSBT_20180927_DSB_D550_084_0002_DSB_2018_00/DSBT_20180927_DSB_D550_084_0002_DSB_2018_00.pdf https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/Dsk/DSBT_20180927_DSB_D5... Is the Austrian Authorities making a 300 Euro fine to a "common citizen" making "illegal" use of a dashcam (it seems - but I am not sure about it - that the issue is that the car is not - how? - visibly marked as videorecording?). Anyone more familiar with German (and legal German) can clear the matter/explain?

jacquesm 6y ago
Why would you pick that example, rather than the 16 million fine an Italian company received?
- jaclaz 6y ago
  As a counter example to the "success" you mentioned. Again if I got it right a "common user" got stinged because of a dashcam. The Italian example you refer to is actually a success, like most other ones, I was objecting not to the Law in itself (that is IMHO a good one) but rather on how it is applied, here and there, in spots and seemingly in a random way.