> You're using random numbers I use some numbers which are my estimations, and not random numbers. I could explain how I made these estimations if you asked (S

> You're using random numbers I use some numbers which are my estimations, and not random numbers. I could explain how I made these estimations if you asked (Short version by definition of risk which is damage multiplied by probability). Also if you disagree with these estimations, you are welcome to suggest your better estimations, how these three scenarios compare to each other. > your entire justification for this spying is that it could be worse. That reads to me like an ad hominem attack in itself. It would be ad hominem attack if I said it could be worse for you. But I didn’t, and not everything is about you, so my argument wasn’t ad hominem. Also, probably best to admit this conversation is derailed and stop it for the good.