> I can't see how CCS (carbon capture and storage) can ever be viable economically. It's pure expense. If fossil fuels weren't available, profitable activities

> I can't see how CCS (carbon capture and storage) can ever be viable economically. It's pure expense. If fossil fuels weren't available, profitable activities that currently release carbon from fossil fuels would be done in other ways. For example, plastics could be made from plants, and a lot of carbon from the atmosphere would end up in landfills as a side effect of making disposable consumer goods.