What you describe is the polar opposite of freedom. It should be immediately dismissed not due to the current political climate but instead because it would est

What you describe is the polar opposite of freedom. It should be immediately dismissed not due to the current political climate but instead because it would establish the ultimate nanny state full of red tape and bureaucracy. No one should be arbitrating personal activities unless they directly and immediately impact those around you. (And for the record, I vehemently disagree with sin taxes such as those for alcohol and tobacco. Legally requiring health warnings on the packaging, on the other hand, makes a lot of sense to me. Also note that alcohol and tobacco have much more consistent and severe health impacts than, say, refined sugar.)