3 ms·
some of these companies, need to start suing microsoft. since it's usually windows affected by these malware attacks. if microsoft wants to keep serving the maj
by dzonga 6y ago
some of these companies, need to start suing microsoft. since it's usually windows affected by these malware attacks. if microsoft wants to keep serving the majority of the corp world, they need to have an os, based on user space system. i.e each program runs in it's own sandbox. and any data passed is via message passing.
- user5994461 6y agoMicrosoft has pretty good security nowadays. It's the fault of companies for never upgrading their machines, giving full administrators access to every employee and using Admin123 as the domain administrator password account. If we believe the article, the virus came from an attachment in an email to a random employee. Why are executable attachments not blocked? Why is an executable running as an unprivileged user able to storm through every computer in the company?
- raverbashing 6y agoBut did they? Were their machines updated? Did they have some "corporate AV" solution that was useless? > Why are executable attachments not blocked? Because there are dozens of weird Windows extension types that execute automatically on Windows, though yeah the attachment should have been blocked and a customer service machine should have a whitelist of programs that need to run (or only run signed ones)
- jankiehodgpodge 6y agoI've seen hundreds of enterprise networks and you'd be surprised how many of them have passwords in public shares, no configured firewalls or software policies and only file level backups. We obviously can't know right now what Garmin's setup was but I'd wager they were guilty of something.