> Moreover, the claim that GPT-3 is a good tool for astroturfing is unproven so far and I am extremely skeptical. Fully agreed. These great "I've only clicked

> Moreover, the claim that GPT-3 is a good tool for astroturfing is unproven so far and I am extremely skeptical. Fully agreed. These great "I've only clicked next ten times" examples are nice and all, but usually are still going nowhere. On the other hand, GPT-3 _is_ pretty good, even when it needs some form of human curation. At some GPT-n we _will_ have this problem (at least with a high probability), so the point still stands. > I don't think even the limit on the ability of individual, "real" people to spout Trollish garbage has been the limit. That's probably true, though.