> > Manual human labor requirement creates a rate limiting which is removed by automated content creation in the name of the human. > What if we impose artific

> > Manual human labor requirement creates a rate limiting which is removed by automated content creation in the name of the human. > What if we impose artificial rate limiting with posting fees or some kind of proof-of-work requirement? These hypothetical anonymized but authenticated interactions are backed (via ZKP or otherwise) by a trusted identity (which itself might be pseudonymous, government verified, whatever). As such, why not track and publish the (approximate) rate at which attestation interactions are undertaken by a given identity (per some very coarse grained unit of time)? This rate could then be linked to the otherwise anonymized actions upon attestation. Then people or platform moderators would be free to make their own judgments about what constitutes a reasonable (ie trustworthy) rate of interaction within a given context. (This is a form of information leakage, so in certain scenarios it could allow deanonymization or at least linking anonymous interactions together. Extreme care would have to be taken when selecting the degree of approximation and the duration of unit time.)