3 ms·
Perhaps so in the context of PCB assembly. In the semiconductor industry we still call them chips. So do Micron Semiconductor [1], TSMC [2] and Intel [3] [1
by Treblemaker 6y ago
Perhaps so in the context of PCB assembly.
In the semiconductor industry we still call them chips.
So do Micron Semiconductor [1], TSMC [2] and Intel [3]
[1] https://www.micron.com/foundation/semiconductors https://www.micron.com/foundation/semiconductors
[2] https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/SoIC.htm https://www.tsmc.com/english/dedicatedFoundry/technology/SoI...
[3] (pdf) http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/chipmaking/Making_of_a_Chip.pdf http://download.intel.com/pressroom/kits/chipmaking/Making_o...
- pwg 6y agoAnd the usage goes back to at least August 1975 (likely earlier): http://archive.6502.org/datasheets/mos_6501-6505_mpu_preliminary_aug_1975.pdf http://archive.6502.org/datasheets/mos_6501-6505_mpu_prelimi... "but including an on-chip clock ... in addition to the on-chip clock"
- kps 6y agoTwo unrelated papers in AFIPS '65 use ‘chip’ in their abstracts, in the integrated circuit sense, and neither draws attention to the term. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1463891.1464005 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1463891.1464005 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1463891.1463961 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1463891.1463961