When they talk about substances with 'global' effects as being too blunt and then talk about 'precise' intervention it reads like some sort of real life Stor Ge

When they talk about substances with 'global' effects as being too blunt and then talk about 'precise' intervention it reads like some sort of real life Stor Gendibal from Asimov's Second Foundation, with his precise adjustments of the fine tendrils of the mind. It's interesting that they depict a human belief in love as "potentially immature" but then substitute it with an alternative, potential immature view, that depends on the materialism belief that somehow we will eventually be able (in a future around the corner) to understand what being human is, and reduce it to a set of detailed material interactions.