4 ms·
Some of my favourite memories involve being out with my friends walking around well after midnight, having discussions that would most certainly not be had in t
by Shared404 6y ago
Some of my favourite memories involve being out with my friends walking around well after midnight, having discussions that would most certainly not be had in the presence of any of our guardians.
> Do you really think it's unreasonable to ask that children out after 10pm (midnight during the summer months) have someone looking after their safety?
Depends. If it's a _child_ proper, like under the age of 14-15 at the _highest_, then no. If they are old enough to be their own person, then yes, absolutely.
- asgeir 6y agoThe law doesn't say parent or guardian. Only an adult. It can be a parent, sibling, friend of the family, whatever. > Depends. If it's a _child_ proper, like under the age of 14-15 at the _highest_, then no The law applies to children aged 16 and younger.
- ginko 6y ago16-year olds aren't children.
- Shared404 6y ago> law doesn't say parent or guardian. Only an adult. ... Same still applies for anyone who is not one of the threeish people I had in my close circle at that point. > The law applies to children aged 16 and younger. I said I disagreed with what the law states, and listed my reasons. I know it's 16 and younger, I said that I believe it should be 14, or 15 at the absolute highest.