It creates a catch-22-enhanced version of Who’s On First[1][2], except it’s Who Has Legal Standing? It results in judges being hesitant to rule as they ought du

It creates a catch-22-enhanced version of Who’s On First[1][2], except it’s Who Has Legal Standing? It results in judges being hesitant to rule as they ought due to intentional muddying of the jurisdictional hierarchy of bureaucracy and who is able to claim standing and harm. It’s a shell game designed to disempower everyone in the courtroom to the boon of those who can never or will never be brought inside one. What if change through the courts is impossible because it would take longer than any one person’s life to acquire standing to sue, and have the case heard? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who%27s_on_First%3F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who%27s_on_First%3F [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTcRRaXV-fg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTcRRaXV-fg